LOGCAP VI Highest Technically Rated Offeror (HTRO) Matrix and PWS RFI
Dept of Defense · DEPT OF THE ARMY
This notice is not accepting responses (deadline was May 31, 2026, 8:00 PM EDT).
Page kept for research and related open opportunities below. For current work in this category, use the related notices or browse hubs.
- Response deadline
- May 31, 2026, 8:00 PM EDT
- Posted
- May 11, 2026
- Solicitation
- —
- Set-aside
- None listed
- Place of performance
- Rock Island, IL, USA
- Contracting office
- W6QK ACC-RI · ROCK ISLAND · IL
- Source
- SAM.gov · updated May 13, 2026
Description
1.0 Purpose and Strategic Context In support of the National Security Strategy and Army Transformation Initiatives, the Army is developing the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) VI. This program will consolidate legacy LOGCAP, Army Pre-Positioned Stock (APS), and Enhanced Army Global Logistics Enterprise (EAGLE) programs into a unified, global logistics enterprise. This Request for Information (RFI) is for specific feedback on the LOGCAP VI PWS and HTRO Matrix. The U.S. Government (USG) seeks constructive feedback from industry on two key components of the developing acquisition strategy: The Draft LOGCAP VI Performance Work Statement (PWS) (v6.0, dated 9 February 2026), which has been previously posted to SAM.gov under Notice ID PANROC-P-0000-025256 on 23 February 2026, to include feedback on future-looking technological and operational requirements for the next generation of logistics support. The Draft LOGCAP VI Highest Technically Rated Offeror (HTRO) Matrix, which is referenced in the questions below. This RFI also provides an opportunity for vendors to submit brief white papers on relevant topics. 2.0 Instructions for Response Respondents are requested to provide the following information at the beginning of their submission: Company Name, CAGE Code, and Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Company Address and primary Point(s) of Contact (Name, Title, Email, Phone) Small Business Certification(s), if applicable. The response must be submitted in two parts: Part A: RFI Questions Respondents are requested to provide a response of no more than ten (10) pages to address the questions in the attachment titled "3.0 Feedback on Draft HTRO Matrix" and a separate response of no more than ten (10) pages to address the questions in the attachment titled "4.0 PWS Feedback and Future Capabilities." For clarity and ease of review, please structure your response to mirror the organization of the question documents. Use the same section headers and question numbers, followed by the corresponding answer. Part B: Optional White Paper In addition to the Part A: RFI questions, respondents are requested to provide a response to 5.0 within the attachment titled �5.0 CLIN Structure Feedback and White Paper Submission�. Vendors are also invited to submit a brief white paper on topics previously covered during LOGCAP VI market research efforts (5.1 within the attachment). This provides an opportunity for industry to offer further insights, innovative concepts, or detailed solutions. The combined response shall be no more than five (5) pages to address both 5.0 and 5.1 of the attachment. Disclaimer: This RFI does not constitute a solicitation. The Government does not intend to award a contract on the basis of the RFI or otherwise pay for the information requested and responses will be treated as information only and not as a proposal. Please submit responses via email to shaun.y.peterson.civ@army.mil, alyse.m.hardin.civ@army.mil, benjamin.p.graw.civ@army.mil, and angela.kim6.mil@army.mil.
What similar awards have paid
Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.
Typical award size
$652,281
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $187,258 and $5.16M
Who has won work like this
Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.
- 1CHEROKEE NATION MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING, L.L.C..1 award$287.01M
- 2ALCYON TECHNICAL SERVICES (ATS) JV, LLC4 awards$229.95M
- 3COTTON COMMERCIAL USA, INC.4 awards$201.75M
- 4OLGOONIK LOGISTICS, LLC2 awards$49.23M
- 5INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS LLC1 award$42.73M
- 6TRAX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION1 award$39.78M
- 7GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF NORTH GEORGIA, INC.1 award$5.61M
- 8HEITECH SERVICES, LLC1 award$5.04M
Recent examples
A few of the newest similar awards in our index.
- OLGOONIK LOGISTICS, LLCSep 29, 2025Department of State$18.09MSource
- OLGOONIK LOGISTICS, LLCSep 27, 2025Department of State$37.00MSource
- TRAX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONSep 26, 2025National Aeronautics and Space Administration$92.14MSource
- ALCYON TECHNICAL SERVICES (ATS) JV, LLCSep 25, 2025National Aeronautics and Space Administration$14.17MSource
- ALCYON TECHNICAL SERVICES (ATS) JV, LLCSep 25, 2025National Aeronautics and Space Administration$75.94MSource
- ALCYON TECHNICAL SERVICES (ATS) JV, LLCSep 25, 2025National Aeronautics and Space Administration$9.46MSource
Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID 2a34ed64a8694b908cb2cfd907629d36.