Study on the Economic Impact of the International Maritime Organization Net Zero Framework
Transportation, Department of · MARITIME ADMINISTRATION
This notice is not accepting responses (deadline was Jun 2, 2026, 8:00 PM EDT).
Page kept for research and related open opportunities below. For current work in this category, use the related notices or browse hubs.
- Response deadline
- Jun 2, 2026, 8:00 PM EDT
- Posted
- May 20, 2026
- Solicitation
- 693JF726R000015
- Set-aside
- No Set aside used
- Place of performance
- Washington, DC, USA
- Contracting office
- 693JF7 DOT MARITIME ADMINISTRATION · WASHINGTON · DC
- Source
- SAM.gov · updated May 21, 2026
Description
The purpose of this amendment no. 0002 is to provide Q&As to this RFP. *****CAREFULLY REVIEW ENTIRE ATTACHED RFP***** The U.S. Maritime Administration is commissioning a targeted cost analysis of the International Maritime Organization�s (IMO) �Net Zero Framework� (NZF), adopted in April 2025, that centers on the NZF�s specific policy mechanisms and their economic consequences for the United States. The study should examine, at minimum, the NZF�s: (a) global GHG pricing/levy proposals (including scope, price trajectory, and pass-through mechanisms). (b) emissions trading and crediting systems. (c) use and role of carbon offsets and related crediting rules. (d) fuel/energy standard or fuel blending mandates. (e) technology mandates, exemptions, and phase in schedules. (f) monitoring, reporting, and verification, auditing and compliance regimes. (g) Fund governance, revenue collection, and allocation rules (including conditionality and funding flows to ports, projects, or countries); and (h) enforcement, penalties, and potential border or trade adjustment measures. MARAD is particularly interested in how each mechanism could: (1) alter operating and capital costs for U.S. flagged and U.S. dependent shipping and logistics; (2) affect import/export unit costs (TEU/ton) and trade competitiveness. (3) change demand for U.S. energy, technology, and maritime services. (4) create administrative and compliance burdens; and (5) risk leakage, double counting, or ineffective mitigation (for example, reliance on offsets that do not deliver measurable reductions). The study should quantify impacts where feasible, identify key assumptions and uncertainties for each mechanism, and analyze distributional effects across U.S. industries, ports, and regions. The contractor should compare outcomes under: (A) the NZF as proposed (mechanism by mechanism); (B) alternative designs that limit or reshape levy/offset components; and (C) delayed or phased implementation scenarios. For each mechanism, the study must recommend practical safeguards, alternative policy instruments, or design changes that would reduce unnecessary economic burdens on U.S. interests while maintaining emissions outcomes rooted in reality, and provide clear metrics and analytical methods that MARAD and U.S. negotiators can use to evaluate NZF proposals moving forward. For each mechanism, the study shall compare the proposed mechanism relative to a �No Action� approach to fully distinguish the costs and benefits to U.S. maritime, trade, and economic interests. *****CAREFULLY REVIEW ENTIRE ATTACHED RFP***** Submission Dates and Times. The deadline for proposal submission is 12:00 PM EDT on Wednesday, June 3, 2026. Please submit proposals in PDF format via email to: Christian Onwudiegwu at Christian.onwudiegwu@dot.gov and Kelly Mitchell-Caroll at K.mitchell-carroll@dot.gov. Do not send paper copies, or other media of the proposal via post office or delivery service. Proposals received by MARAD after the deadline will not be considered for award. An email will be deemed �received� by MARAD on the date and time the email was �sent� to the email address in Section E.7, below, as determined by MARAD�s servers. *****CAREFULLY REVIEW ENTIRE ATTACHED RFP*****
What similar awards have paid
Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.
Typical award size
$648,594
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $51,149 and $2.86M
Who has won work like this
Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.
- 1FORS MARSH GROUP LLC3 awards$9.72M
- 2NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION1 award$1.16M
- 3HISTORICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.1 award$134,495
- 4FLANAGAN MINDY E1 award$65,699
- 5DDC ADVOCACY LLC2 awards$7,500
Recent examples
A few of the newest similar awards in our index.
- DDC ADVOCACY LLCSep 18, 2025General Services Administration$7,500Source
- DDC ADVOCACY LLCSep 17, 2025General Services Administration$7,500Source
- FORS MARSH GROUP LLCAug 12, 2025General Services Administration$3.82MSource
- FORS MARSH GROUP LLCAug 6, 2025General Services Administration$3.13MSource
- FORS MARSH GROUP LLCJul 29, 2025General Services Administration$2.77MSource
- FLANAGAN MINDY EJun 4, 2025Department of Veterans Affairs$65,699Source
Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID 3bf976cde051499aa61499da1f38b949.