E-6B Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) Services
Dept of Defense · DEPT OF THE NAVY
- Response deadline
- Jul 20, 2026, 12:00 PM EDT
- Posted
- Jul 13, 2026
- Solicitation
- 28RFPREQAPM2710009
- Set-aside
- None listed
- Place of performance
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Contracting office
- NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND · PATUXENT RIVER · MD
- Source
- SAM.gov · updated Jul 13, 2026
Description
This Request for Information (RFI) is a follow-up to E-6B Sources Sought 28RFPREQAPM2710009 posted on 06 May 2026. The Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR), on behalf of PMA-271 (Airborne Strategic Command, Control and Communications Program Office) is contemplating an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract with a base five (5) year ordering period with an option for five (5) additional one (1) year ordering periods for the upcoming requirement and provides this RFI seeking industry feedback on the feasibility, benefits, and unique challenges associated with a base five (5) year ordering period with an option for five (5) additional one (1) year ordering periods. This is a RFI only. This notice is issued solely for information and planning purposes and does not constitute a solicitation. This RFI is not a request for proposals, quotations, or bids, and the Government will not award a contract based on responses to this notice. Responses are voluntary and will be used by the Government for market research purposes only. The Government does not intend to reimburse respondents for any costs incurred in preparing or submitting information in response to this notice. Objective To assist the Government in its acquisition planning, interested vendors are requested to provide feedback addressing the following areas: Requested Information What are the primary risks, constraints, or challenges your company would anticipate with a base five (5) year ordering period with an option for five (5) additional one (1) year ordering periods? How does a base five (5) year ordering period with an option for five (5) additional one (1) year ordering periods impact your approach to long-term estimating and economic fluctuations? What contract mechanisms or strategies would you recommend to address long-term pricing uncertainty? How would a base five (5) year ordering period with an option for five (5) additional one (1) year ordering periods affect your supply chain management, subcontractor relationships, and overall vendor base? How would a base five (5) year ordering period with an option for five (5) additional one (1) year ordering periods impact your teaming arrangements, subcontracts, and agreements with Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and suppliers? Would this duration provide better leverage for long-term pricing agreements? What potential benefits, efficiencies, risks, challenges, or opportunities (e.g., in operational planning, upfront investment, or process improvements) could a base five (5) year ordering period with an option for five (5) additional one (1) year ordering periods provide to your company and the Government? Response Instructions Interested parties should submit a written response not to exceed 2 pages. Responses should include: Company name UEI Business size and socioeconomic status Point of contact information Responses to any or all of the questions above Responses should be submitted electronically to Contract Specialist Randolph Putnam at randolph.a.putnam.civ@us.navy.mil and Procuring Contracting Officer Lisa J. Troccoli at lisa.j.troccoli.civ@us.navy.mil. Responses are requested no later than 20 July 2026. Respondents are responsible for clearly identifying any proprietary or confidential information contained in their submissions. The Government will protect such information in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
What similar awards have paid
Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.
Typical award size
$40,617
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $14,481 and $139,182
Who has won work like this
Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.
- 1PAE AVIATION AND TECHNICAL SERVICES LLC2 awards$773.81M
- 2AAR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.5 awards$665.63M
- 3AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.1 award$623.33M
- 4VERTEX AEROSPACE LLC1 award$124.75M
- 5NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION3 awards$95.00M
- 6VERTEX AEROSPACE LLC6 awards$88.29M
- 7KING AEROSPACE, INC.1 award$27.76M
- 8AAR AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC.1 award$24.98M
Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID 3fd07a627c9b4c11b85eb423006d474a.