Amendment 2 to Solicitation for Ultra-High Vacuum Sample Backout Chamber Extension of Time
Commerce, Department of · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
This notice is not accepting responses (deadline was Mar 4, 2026, 12:00 PM EST).
Page kept for research and related open opportunities below. For current work in this category, use the related notices or browse hubs.
- Response deadline
- Mar 4, 2026, 12:00 PM EST
- Posted
- Feb 23, 2026
- Solicitation
- 1333ND26QNB030068
- Set-aside
- Total Small Business
- Place of performance
- Boulder, CO, USA
- Contracting office
- DEPT OF COMMERCE NIST · GAITHERSBURG · MD
- Source
- SAM.gov · updated Jul 5, 2026
Description
AMENDMENT 2: Extension of time 1 week from February 25,2026 to new date for responses March 4,2026. AMENDMENT TO SOLICITATION FOR VENDOR QUESTIONS Solicitation 1333ND26QNB030068 Ultra High Vacuum Sample Backout Chamber Vendor Question 1: To accurately provide a quote for the chamber and frame, I would need a drawing, STEP file, and/or sketch, as a written description alone is not sufficient for an accurate quote. NIST Response: There are many ways to design and assemble a system with the capabilities that we are requesting. We have not provided a technical drawing to allow the vendor the flexibility to design a system to meet our specifications as they see fit. We will evaluate on conformance to specifications, not a particular design. Vendor Question 2: Regarding Technical Specification b. �Partial pressure for masses >44 AMU: <5e-11 Torr�: How is this intended to be controlled / measured with a base pressure of 1e-8 Torr. NIST Response: We will verify the stated specification with an RGA unit in our lab. Ultimately, this specification is to ensure that the UHV system is not contaminated with higher amu contaminants. The overall pressure is allowed to be 1e-8 Torr due to lower amu components (e.g. water) that we can more readily get rid of with a bake-out. We are not equipped to do the requisite UHV cleaning for higher mass contaminants (silicones, oils, etc.) so this requirement ensures the vendor provides us with a UHV-clean system. Vendor Question 3: Will a cylindrical chamber work rather than a cube or a sphere, so long as the volume requirements are met and there are enough ports? NIST Response: A cylindrical chamber with the same 12� opening dimensions would also suffice. Vendor Question 4: What is the geometry of the sample types to be going into the chamber? Is it like a wafer? NIST Response: We will be using this chamber on a variety of sample sizes and shapes. As defined in the attached Combined Synopsis Solicitation, Statement of Work and applicable Clauses and Provisions.
What similar awards have paid
Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.
Typical award size
$60,000
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $24,416 and $166,579
Who has won work like this
Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.
- 1LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION78 awards$91.50M
- 2ABBOTT LABORATORIES INC.70 awards$67.28M
- 3ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION128 awards$65.72M
- 4FEDERAL RESOURCES SUPPLY COMPANY, LLC14 awards$51.41M
- 5BECKMAN COULTER, INC133 awards$42.51M
- 6SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC.59 awards$37.27M
- 7SYSMEX AMERICA, INC147 awards$33.83M
- 8GOVERNMENT SCIENTIFIC SOURCE INC331 awards$31.79M
Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID 8b21caab1f9c46bfae4243b4f64c40da.