ATIC Support Industrial Control System Phase 1 Review Edwards AFB
Dept of Defense · DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE
This notice is not accepting responses (deadline was Feb 20, 2026, 1:00 PM EST).
Page kept for research and related open opportunities below. For current work in this category, use the related notices or browse hubs.
- Response deadline
- Feb 20, 2026, 1:00 PM EST
- Posted
- Feb 4, 2026
- Solicitation
- FA930226Q0012
- Set-aside
- No Set aside used
- Place of performance
- Edwards, CA, USA
- Contracting office
- FA9302 AFTC PZZ · EDWARDS AFB · CA
- Source
- SAM.gov · updated Jul 5, 2026
Description
ATIC Support Industrial Control System Phase 1 Review Edwards AFB in Accordance with PWS dated 22 January 2026. A site visit will not be held for this requirement unless deemed necessary. Questions are due on 13 February 2026 at 10:00AM PT. Quotes are due on 20 February 2026 at 10:00AM PT. The provision at FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors�Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Sep 2023), applies to this acquisition. Provisions and clauses can be viewed via internet at Acquisition.gov, https://www.acquisition.gov/. Offerors shall prepare their quotations in accordance with FAR 52.212-1. In addition, the following information shall be included: PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION WITHIN YOUR QUOTE: 1. SAM UEI: 2. CAGE Code: 3. Contractor Name: 4. Payment Terms (NET 30) or Discount: 5. Point of Contact Name and Phone Number: 6. Email address: 7. Date Offer Expires: 8. Capabilities Statement: 12. Completed copy of FAR 52.212-3, Alt I, Offeror Representations and Certifications�Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Feb 2024) � or - notification that FAR 52.212-3 representations and certifications are available on SAM.gov (vii) The provision at FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation�Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021) applies to this acquisition. ***Please read the evaluation criteria closely. If vendor does not provide a full response, it will be found unresponsive*** The solicitation provides that quotations will be evaluated using overall Best Value. The following are evaluation factors: 1. Technical Acceptability 2. Price. 3. Past Performance It is the government�s intent to award without discussions. Therefore, each initial quote should contain the offeror�s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer (CO) determines that discussions are necessary.
What similar awards have paid
Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.
Typical award size
$2.27M
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $540,537 and $8.98M
Who has won work like this
Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.
- 1BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC32 awards$3.45B
- 2SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION6 awards$1.57B
- 3HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP4 awards$1.54B
- 4CACI NSS, LLC6 awards$1.43B
- 5GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.7 awards$987.98M
- 6LEIDOS, INC.4 awards$733.65M
- 7LMI CONSULTING, LLC4 awards$590.75M
- 8KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC1 award$536.74M
Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID 8e6e1cdd5b1c468ebfaefa97eb6526f1.