Maintenance Dredging of NY & NJ Channels, Arthur Kill 35� Reach, Federal Navigation Project
Dept of Defense · DEPT OF THE ARMY
This notice is not accepting responses (deadline was Jan 21, 2026, 2:00 PM EST).
Page kept for research and related open opportunities below. For current work in this category, use the related notices or browse hubs.
- Response deadline
- Jan 21, 2026, 2:00 PM EST
- Posted
- Jan 6, 2026
- Solicitation
- W912DS26S0010
- Set-aside
- Total Small Business
- Place of performance
- NJ, USA
- Contracting office
- W2SD ENDIST NEW YORK · NEW YORK · NY
- Source
- SAM.gov · updated Jul 5, 2026
Description
The New York District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) proposes to perform maintenance dredging of New York and New Jersey Channels, Arthur Kill 35� Reach, Federal Navigation Channel to a depth of -35 feet Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) plus 1 foot of allowable overdepth. The proposed maintenance dredging would remove approximately 150,000 cubic yards (CY) of material from critically shoaled areas with subsequent placement at a contractor provided, state-permitted upland placement site(s). Based on the past dredging projects within the New York Harbor / New York and New Jersey Channels, and restrictions in the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation / New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Water Quality Certificates, the proposed work would be performed by utilizing a mechanical clamshell dredge with environmental bucket. Additionally, multiple barges, tugboats and survey vessels will be needed to perform the work during the dredging and placement activities. The dredging and placement would be required to meet all federal, state, and approved local criteria required by the government agencies having jurisdiction where the dredging and placement sites are located. Once the contract is awarded, the contractor will be required to commence work within five (5) calendar days after the date of receipt of the Notice to Proceed and maintain an integrated production rate of at least 2,500 cubic yards per calendar day for the dredging and placement of the dredged material. The presence of the dredging equipment in the channel will impact ship traffic, and it is necessary to maintain this production rate while minimizing the duration of this impact. The proposed work is anticipated to take place in the summer/fall of 2026 The magnitude of this contract is between $10,000,000 and $25,000,000. SURVEY OF THE DREDGING INDUSTRY The following confidential survey questionnaire is designed to apprise the Corps of prospective dredging contractors� project execution capabilities. Please provide your response to the following questions. All questions are in regards to the New York and New Jersey Channels, Arthur Kill 35� Reach, maintenance dredging project. General 1. Have you ever worked on dredging jobs similar in nature to this project? If so, please describe the project and for whom the work was performed. Identify a point of contact and phone number, as a reference of relevant experience. 2. Have you previously performed dredging within the waters of New York and New Jersey? 3. What percentage of work (volume of material dredged, transported, and ultimately placed) can you perform with your own equipment or equipment owned by another dredging contractor? 4. Would you be willing to bid on the project described? If the answer is No, please explain why not. 5. Would you be bidding on this project as a sole contractor, prime contractor with subcontractor(s), or as a joint venture? 6. Is there a dollar limit on the size of contract that you would bid? If so, what is that limit? 7. What is the largest dredging contract, in dollars, on which you were the prime contractor? 8. What is your bonding capacity per contract? What is your total bonding capacity? 9. Do you have experience using USACE Resident Management System (RMS) 3.0 for delivering Submittals, Daily Dredging Reports and Pay Estimates? 10. Do you have experience applying USACE EM 385-1-1 (March 2024) and all requirements? Deficiencies observed on site will require immediate attention and action to meet all applicable safety codes. Equipment 11. What type of dredge equipment do you own and/or operate that is suitable for the work described? Do you own a mechanical dredge with a closed environmental clamshell bucket? Please list each piece of equipment capable of performing the work described, i.e. dredging, transfer, transportation, dewatering and/or other processing and final placement of the material. For each dredge that you list, please specify its bucket size(s), and any other salient characteristics. 12. Identify which dredge(s), including support equipment (tug, crew boat, scows, etc.), you would employ on this project. Also, for each dredge, identify the maximum dredging depth. 13. Do you own material scows? If so, how many do you have available for use? Please list the name of the scow, its type (ocean going, sealed-hull, etc.) and the capacity. 14. Will you be able to meet a production rate of 2,500 cubic yards per calendar day and complete all work? 15. Do you have experience with the use of an automated Dredged Material Monitoring System (Black Box/Silent Inspector) employing a Dredged Material Inspector (DMI)? 16. Are you aware that the Contractor is responsible for coordinating with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an FAA Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis? Have you had any experience requesting for FAA Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis? If so, please list the 3 most recent projects along with the project's NTP, the review submission date, the number of studies conducted, and duration of the review. 17. What are the minimum and maximum boom heights to operate your dredge(s) safely and efficiently?
What similar awards have paid
Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.
Typical award size
$1.37M
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $245,584 and $6.03M
Who has won work like this
Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.
- 1NW CONSTRUCTION, INC5 awards$501.93M
- 2KIEWIT INFRASTRUCTURE WEST CO.1 award$217.24M
- 3BWI TPC, A JOINT VENTURE1 award$186.81M
- 4TECH2 SOLUTIONS11 awards$180.54M
- 5APOGEE GROUP, LLC7 awards$170.82M
- 6MANSON CONSTRUCTION CO3 awards$146.09M
- 7C & C CONTRACTORS LLC8 awards$144.01M
- 8GARCO CONSTRUCTION, INC.2 awards$143.39M
Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID 909adc80a02e4fedb38c551a0054f4ae.