Regional Educational Laboratory Program: 2027 � 2031 Cycle
Education, Department of · EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF
This notice is not accepting responses (deadline was Jan 8, 2026, 10:00 AM EST).
Page kept for research and related open opportunities below. For current work in this category, use the related notices or browse hubs.
- Response deadline
- Jan 8, 2026, 10:00 AM EST
- Posted
- Dec 18, 2025
- Solicitation
- REL-CYCLE2027
- Set-aside
- No Set aside used
- Place of performance
- DC, USA
- Contracting office
- INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION SCIENCES · WASHINGTON · DC
- Source
- SAM.gov · updated Jul 5, 2026
Description
The U.S. Department of Education (the Department) is conducting market research to determine if sufficient interest and capability exist in the marketplace for the Regional Educational Laboratory Program, 2027-2031 Cycle. This notice is NOT a request for proposals but is an invitation for potential offerors to express interest and provide information regarding their relevant knowledge, skills, and capabilities. Information submitted in response to this Sources Sought Notice may be used to assist the Department in finalizing its acquisition strategy. The U.S. Department of Education (the Department) intends to award 60-month contracts to qualified entities to serve as the Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) for up to 10 REL regions. These contracts are planned to be firm fixed price with cost-reimbursable travel restricted to a percentage of the overall contract value. See Appendix A for the names of the regions and their constituent states or jurisdictions. Each individual REL will be part of a program of 10 RELs authorized under the Education Sciences Reform Act (ESRA) of 2002, Part D, Section 174 (20 U.S.C. 9564). The REL Program is administered by the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE) at the Institute of Education Sciences (IES)[1] in the US Department of Education (the Department). REL personnel shall include researchers with significant and demonstrated scholarly expertise in content areas and methodologies relevant to the work the REL undertakes as well as practitioners who have significant experience teaching and leading professional development in those content areas. RELs shall develop a team that includes experts of several types, listed below: Content experts who possess a broad and deep perspective on what is known and what still is not settled in a research field. They enable the REL to frame important research questions and Training, Coaching, and Technical Support (TCTS) activities so that they both address immediate needs for evidence, as well as advance knowledge more broadly through applied research. Potential lead authors of REL reports who shall have demonstrated expertise in the content area being addressed by the report, shown through a substantial portfolio of peer-reviewed, published work in that area. Methodological experts who ensure research questions are answered using appropriate methods and support the intended outcomes of the project. Current or recent practitioners who provide project staff additional context on problems of practice educators are facing. Experts in adult learning or professional development who can lead and inform the design and conduct of TCTS activities. The REL Program�s authorizing statute identifies eligible offerors in Section 174(c). Specifically: �The Director may enter into contracts under this section with research organizations, institutions, agencies, institutions of higher education, or partnerships among such entities, or individuals, with the demonstrated ability or capacity to carry out the activities described in this section �� All potential offerors meeting these criteria are encouraged to respond to this RFI. [1] https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ279/PLAW-107publ279.pdf
What similar awards have paid
Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.
Typical award size
$5.61M
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $413,525 and $16.30M
Who has won work like this
Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.
- 1RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE14 awards$576.82M
- 2MATHEMATICA INC.20 awards$495.95M
- 3THE LEWIN GROUP, INC.15 awards$313.76M
- 4WESTAT, INC.3 awards$279.80M
- 5WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY1 award$169.11M
- 6AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES17 awards$139.21M
- 7MATHEMATICA INC.10 awards$95.32M
- 8DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP5 awards$80.79M
Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID 90a656a8f0444d2f992535ab08997e8b.