Less Than Lethal (LTL) Technical Security Systems (TSS) Product
State, Department of · STATE, DEPARTMENT OF
This notice is not accepting responses (deadline was Mar 13, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT).
Page kept for research and related open opportunities below. For current work in this category, use the related notices or browse hubs.
- Response deadline
- Mar 13, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
- Posted
- Feb 13, 2026
- Solicitation
- 19AQMM26XXXX
- Set-aside
- None listed
- PSC
- —
- Place of performance
- —
- Contracting office
- ACQUISITIONS - AQM MOMENTUM · WASHINGTON · DC
- Source
- SAM.gov · updated Jul 5, 2026
Description
Background As the law enforcement and security arm of the U.S. Department of State (DOS), the Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS) is responsible for providing a safe and secure environment for the conduct of U.S. foreign policy. To defend its compounds against intruders and other unauthorized activities, DS employs security measures intended to deter, detect, and delay perpetrators of hostile or clandestine acts, and to provide notification and response time for security personnel. Others are intended to suppress or disable potential attacks. DS is looking to identify companies with subject matter expertise in LTL compound defense systems, and in identifying commercial off the shelf (COTS) or modified COTS systems. These may be new and/or emerging LTL technologies that may, or may not, be presently commercially available. These technologies should offer improved performance and new/enhanced capabilities to meet DS�s LTL requirements for crowd control and deterrence within a diplomatic environment. The requirement of any future procurement will be a COTS product that is available for sale to the U.S. government or a U.S. government contractor or sub-contractor. Through a structured, validated process, the Technology Development Branch (DS/ST/FSE/TDB) identifies, evaluates, approves, documents, and provides technical support for all TSSs used by the DOS at overseas facilities. TDB also provides subject matter expertise to support TSSs that are deployed in the field. Objective Respondents are encouraged to respond to individual system categories. It is important to note that a respondent does not need to have a solution for every system category mentioned to submit a response. If a requirement cannot be met in full, the respondent shall state to what extent a particular requirement can be met. Systems of interest include, but are not limited to acoustic, radio frequency (RF) energy, chemical, pressurized water, food-grade irritant, laser, fog, foam, and others not identified herein. Systems shall not use an explosive charge to deploy irritants. The LTL system would be used for crowd control and dispersal. Within the requirements listed below the terms of objective and threshold are defined as follows: Objective: Desired parameter, not hard requirement. Threshold: Minimum acceptable requirement. RFI Deliverables All respondents are requested to provide detailed information on available systems, to include a detailed response to the TDB LTL requirements matrix. Respondents should state which requirements are met and which are not, technical specifications of the proposed system, physical specifications of the proposed system, images of the proposed system, maturity of the technology, impact to existing infrastructure, details of current installations, and a rough order of magnitude cost for a system covering double door entrance points at four different locations on a 200-meter by 400-meter compound. Please reference the enclosed word document attachment for the DOS Less-than-Lethal Defensive System Requirements Matrix.
What similar awards have paid
Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.
Typical award size
$446,844
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $143,578 and $1.66M
Who has won work like this
Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.
- 1BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC203 awards$4.33B
- 2HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP10 awards$2.97B
- 3GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.41 awards$2.39B
- 4THE MITRE CORPORATION5 awards$2.34B
- 5SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION109 awards$2.29B
- 6PERATON INC.12 awards$2.28B
- 7LEIDOS, INC.13 awards$1.66B
- 8MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.6 awards$1.57B
Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID 98c524fd61c84d219b3c31fa8cc9453d.