REDUCER, PIPE
Dept of Defense · DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
This notice is not accepting responses (deadline was Jun 25, 2026, 8:00 PM EDT).
Page kept for research and related open opportunities below. For current work in this category, use the related notices or browse hubs.
- Response deadline
- Jun 25, 2026, 8:00 PM EDT
- Posted
- Jun 14, 2026
- Solicitation
- SPMYM4-26-Q-3483
- Set-aside
- No Set aside used
- Place of performance
- —
- Contracting office
- DLA MARITIME - PEARL HARBOR · PEARL HARBOR · HI
- Source
- SAM.gov · updated Jun 15, 2026
Description
Submission Instructions To be considered for award, offerors shall complete and submit Solicitation No. SPMYM4-26-Q-XXXX, along with their company quotation and technical data sheet (if applicable), via email to the Contracting Specialist at wongduean.a.guajardo.civ@us.navy.mil no later than the date and time specified in the solicitation (Hawaii Standard Time). If the quotation is not submitted using Standard Form (SF) 1449, the offeror shall include a statement confirming full agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions of the solicitation. Quotations that fail to provide all required information or that take exception to solicitation terms and conditions may be deemed non-responsive and excluded from consideration. Evaluation Factors Quotations will be evaluated based on the following factors: Technical Acceptability Delivery Price Quotation Requirements 1. Firm-Fixed-Price Requirement Quotations shall represent a firm-fixed price for the entire requirement. Post-award price increases will not be accepted. 2. Unconditional Acceptance By submitting a quotation, the vendor agrees to accept award at the quoted price without modification to price, terms, or conditions. 3. Award Acceptance Failure to accept the Government�s purchase order at the quoted price may result in the quotation being determined non-responsive. 4. No Counteroffers After Award Any post-award request to revise pricing or terms will be considered non-acceptance of the purchase order. 5. Delivery and Pricing Requirements Quoted prices shall include all costs associated with materials, labor (if applicable), packaging, and delivery. 6. OEM, Traceability, and Country of Origin Requirements Offerors shall identify the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), brand name, and manufacturer part number, and country of origin. When applicable, proof of OEM authorization or authorized distribution may be required to ensure product authenticity, warranty validity, and supply chain traceability. 7. Source Approval Requests (SAR) If the offeror (or their underlying manufacturer) is not currently an approved military source for this Level I part, a complete Source Approval Request (SAR) package must be submitted concurrently with the quote. Offers from unapproved sources failing to submit a technically sufficient SAR package will be rejected without further evaluation. 8. Evaluation Criteria Quotes must include a technical data sheet confirming compliance with Level I traceability, confirmation of ability to host DCMA for GSI at the manufacturing origin, and a complete price breakdown. EVALUATION CRITERIA (Lowest Price Technically Acceptable): Award will be made to the lowest-priced, responsible offeror whose quote conforms to the solicitation and is determined to be technically acceptable (subject to the cascading rules outlined in Section 4). To be determined technically acceptable, the offeror must explicitly agree to and demonstrate compliance with: FAR 52.246-11 Higher-Level Contract Quality Requirement: Full compliance with ISO 9001, AS9100, or equivalent military quality frameworks. Level I Traceability: Provision of original, untranscribed mill test reports tracked to unique Material Identification and Control (MIC) numbers physically marked on the parts. Specialty Metals Compliance: Adherence to DFARS 252.225-7009. Technical Acceptability: Meeting all drawings, specifications, and strict Level I Objective Quality Evidence (OQE) tracking. Quality Framework: Ability to successfully comply with and host Government Source Inspection (GSI) via DCMA. Price: The lowest total evaluated price. Questions All questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted electronically via email to the Contracting Specialist at the address listed above.
What similar awards have paid
Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.
Typical award size
$26,850
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $17,290 and $47,373
Who has won work like this
Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.
- 1S&H PRODUCTS, LLC1 award$288,075
- 2TORK SYSTEMS INC2 awards$118,679
- 3FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC2 awards$110,246
- 4GRISWOLD INDUSTRIES1 award$92,532
- 5TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL INC1 award$80,360
- 6MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES1 award$73,948
- 7PRECISION CRYOGENIC SYSTEMS, INC2 awards$58,745
- 8JA MOODY LLC1 award$52,136
Recent examples
A few of the newest similar awards in our index.
- TUCSON WINSUPPLY COSep 25, 2025Department of Veterans Affairs$13,281Source
- PRECISION CRYOGENIC SYSTEMS, INCSep 18, 2025National Aeronautics and Space Administration$12,550Source
- MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEESSep 9, 2025Department of State$73,948Source
- ABBOTT VALVE & FITTING CO.Sep 5, 2025National Aeronautics and Space Administration$23,166Source
- TROY BOILER WORKS, INCAug 28, 2025Department of Veterans Affairs$29,441Source
- TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL INCAug 14, 2025National Aeronautics and Space Administration$80,360Source
Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID 9b570dac2b35465eb1eefbcc2a1d1002.