56--NV-STILLWATER NWRC-HUNTER RD GRAVEL PROJ
Interior, Department of the · US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
This notice is not accepting responses (deadline was Feb 25, 2026, 1:00 PM EST).
Page kept for research and related open opportunities below. For current work in this category, use the related notices or browse hubs.
- Response deadline
- Feb 25, 2026, 1:00 PM EST
- Posted
- Feb 23, 2026
- Solicitation
- 140F0S26Q0004
- Set-aside
- Total Small Business
- Place of performance
- —
- Contracting office
- FWS, OVER SAT G/S · Falls Church · VA
- Source
- SAM.gov · updated Jul 5, 2026
Description
NV-STILLWATER NWRC-HUNTER RD GRAVEL PROJ Type 2 Class B base course with Tailgate spread for Fallon NV. See SOW in solicitation packet for specifications. Provide a statement that you understand the standard for Type 2 Class B base course as defined in the SOW and include your CAGE code in your submission. **AMENDMENT 2, Update** The Government has $560,042.96. The vendor is requested to update their quotes to provide the quantity of stone that can be provided for this amount. ********** Email Robert_Sung@fws.gov for questions and your quotes. RFI Q&A response Q1: After reviewing this requirement with our subcontractor, we received the following clarification from them: "If the trucks ran consecutively, they could all dump in sequence, allowing the refuge staff time to work the material before the trucks returned for their second and third trips. The total daily tonnage can be adjusted to suit your needs by increasing or decreasing the number of trucks. We anticipate approximately 800-1,000 tons per shift. The material would be delivered using belly dump trains, leaving a window for the refuge staff to spread. We would revise the proposal to include minimum truck spacing. However, doing so would limit roughly half the trucks to only two loads per day, increasing the cost per ton. Based on this scenario and eight trucks per day, spacing would be approximately 15-30 minutes between loads, followed by about 1.25 hours of downtime between the last truck in the first rotation and the first truck returning for the second rotation. This would result in approximately 800 tons per shift." Based on this, strict adherence to the minimum 15-minute spacing requirement would materially affect operational efficiency and increase the cost per ton. We would respectfully like to inquire whether there is any flexibility in the delivery spacing requirement. Specifically: A. Would consecutive dumping be acceptable if coordinated safely and efficiently with the grading contractor? B. Is the 15-minute minimum interval mandatory throughout the entire shift, or could it be adjusted during certain delivery windows? C. Would alternative staging or sequencing methods be considered, provided safety and site control are maintained? A1: The refuge does have some flexibility on the spacing of the trucks and could be coordinated at that time with the project coordinator. During the work day - we will have a refuge staff member who is stationed to take the tickets from drivers and direct them when it is safe to unload. However, we have completed similar projects at least three times in the past 5 years with various contractors. A 15-minute interval between trucks was generally what they averaged between trucks just based on how long it took the for each load to be filled between the first and the next truck at the gravel pit. Across the projects, delivery has averaged between 800-1k tons per day. For the specific questions: A. Yes, consecutive dumping can be coordinated with the refuge staff who will be completing the gravel grading. B. The 15 minute interval would not be mandatory and could vary throughout the shift, but would need to be coordinated with staff on site. C. Alternative staging or sequencing methods could be considered, provided safety and site control are maintained. The contractor would be responsible for coordinating with the project manager on site and ultimately would be responsible for ensuring the gravel is delivered to its final location on the delivery route.
What similar awards have paid
Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.
Typical award size
$216,440
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $45,238 and $355,500
Who has won work like this
Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.
- 1GIVING TREE CAPITAL, LLC3 awards$1.69M
- 2CF PADILLA LLC1 award$1.04M
- 3SPECIALIZED GOVERNMENT SOURCING, INC.1 award$576,400
- 4TODD MARCHANT1 award$540,375
- 5BRANSCOME OPERATING, LLC1 award$357,000
- 6JADE EXCAVATION INC.1 award$355,000
- 7ECOLOGY MIR GROUP LLC1 award$342,914
- 8ANSON EXCAVATING & PIPE, INC.1 award$340,000
Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID 9f44bb6b932f4777b0a5cdac68a2abb6.