Aerospace Readiness Enterprise System (ARES)_Draft_Amendment 1
Dept of Defense · DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE
This notice is not accepting responses (deadline was Oct 31, 2025, 4:00 PM EDT).
Page kept for research and related open opportunities below. For current work in this category, use the related notices or browse hubs.
- Response deadline
- Oct 31, 2025, 4:00 PM EDT
- Posted
- Oct 28, 2025
- Solicitation
- ARES_PROTOTYPE_OPPORTUNITY_DRAFT
- Set-aside
- None listed
- Place of performance
- Hanscom AFB, MA, USA
- Contracting office
- FA8730 KESSEL RUN AFLCMC/HBBK · HANSCOM AFB · MA
- Source
- SAM.gov · updated Jul 5, 2026
Description
****The intent for this DRAFT posting is to recieve feedback and questions from industry; the Government does not seek nor intend to receive Draft Proposals from offeror teams.***** Prototyping is a means of testing assumptions about technologies and approaches before expending significant amounts of effort or money building something that may not address the organization�s problem. Prototyping is a low-cost, rapid risk mitigation approach. As such, we propose that the first Aerospace Readiness Enterprise System (ARES) use case be built as a prototype initially, with the following capability goals. ARES is the Air Force�s enterprise solution for scheduling, standardization and evaluation (stan/eval) and training management which is intended to replace the Patriot Excalibur (PEX), Puckboard, and Graduate/Training Integration Management System (G/TIMS) legacy software programs. Specifically, ARES will leverage commercial software to the greatest extent possible and be deployed, initially, within the Impact Level (IL) 4 partition with a path to IL-6 deployment thereafter. Further, the Air Force, in support of the DAF BATTLE NETWORK, has an enduring requirement to deploy a robust solution which provides enterprise capabilities for scheduling, stan/eval, and training for increased readiness and lethality. Starting with the requirements of Air Education and Training Command (AETC) as the basis for this prototype, but not excluding requirements from other MAJCOMs, the prototype should meet as many of the following criteria as possible. Final acceptance of the prototype will be based on its ability to meet the threshold requirements outlined below. The final evaluation of the prototypes will also consider objective criteria as defined below. The prototype shall be completed and available for inspection and use no later than 90 calendar days after contract award.
What similar awards have paid
Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.
Typical award size
$115,225
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $29,425 and $643,974
Who has won work like this
Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.
- 1FOUR POINTS TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.838 awards$2.04B
- 2FCN, INC.1162 awards$2.00B
- 3V3GATE, LLC447 awards$1.73B
- 4MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC479 awards$1.63B
- 5THUNDERCAT TECHNOLOGY, LLC1110 awards$1.51B
- 6LEIDOS, INC.8 awards$1.35B
- 7ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC39 awards$1.22B
- 8CGI FEDERAL INC.133 awards$1.21B
Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID 9fcef4d1298b43d5b2a2c1d10f6df1f1.