Request for Information - Executive Writing Course
Dept of Defense · DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE
This notice is not accepting responses (deadline was Apr 14, 2026, 1:00 PM EDT).
Page kept for research and related open opportunities below. For current work in this category, use the related notices or browse hubs.
- Response deadline
- Apr 14, 2026, 1:00 PM EDT
- Posted
- Mar 31, 2026
- Solicitation
- FA701426QB008
- Set-aside
- No Set aside used
- Place of performance
- USA
- Contracting office
- FA7014 AFDW PK · ANDREWS AFB · MD
- Source
- SAM.gov · updated Jul 5, 2026
Description
REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION: The Government seeks industry input to support the development of an acquisition strategy for an Executive Writing Course (EWC) for Space Force staff action officers. The objective is to improve the quality, clarity, and effectiveness of executive-level written communication. The SAF Action Officer Course (AOC) is a mandatory prerequisite. HQSF/DSK intends to supplement AOC with an Executive Writing Course focused on producing decision-ready staff products (e.g., EXSUMs, memos, executive summaries). The contractor will be responsible for course development, administration, instruction, and performance reporting. REQUESTED INFORMATION: Capability & Experience Relevant experience delivering executive writing or leadership communication training. Experience supporting DoD or federal senior staff environments. Technical Approach Recommended course duration and structure. Approach to teaching executive writing principles. Methods for measuring student improvement. Staffing Proposed labor categories and qualifications. Instructor experience expectations. Timeline to obtain the required skill sets to successfully perform this requirement. Delivery Model Recommended class size and frequency. Ability to support surge requirements. Experience delivering training via Microsoft Teams. Performance Metrics Feedback on proposed metrics (e.g., 90% improvement, 95% satisfaction). Suggested alternative metrics. Data Rights Feedback on Government Purpose Rights requirement. Identification of any proprietary materials. Pricing (Rough Order of Magnitude) Provide ROM pricing for: Course development Per-course delivery Annual sustainment/updates Include assumptions and key cost drivers. Contracting Strategy Feedback Feedback on single-award BPA vs alternatives. Recommended contract structure. Please identify any contract vehicles through which your company can provide the required services. Include, at a minimum, applicable GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) contracts, decentralized or agency-specific ordering vehicles, and any other Government-wide, multi-agency, or internally managed contract vehicles. For each vehicle, provide the contract number, scope relevance, ordering method, and any applicable limitations. Small Business Participation Business size and socioeconomic status. Teaming or subcontracting approach. Risks & Assumptions Key risks in execution. Recommended changes to the requirement. SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS Format: PDF or Word Page Limit: 15 pages maximum Font: 12-point minimum Submission Method: Email Subject Line: �RFI Response � EWC Support � [Company Name] INDUSTRY ENGAGEMENT: The Government may conduct: Follow-on one-on-one sessions Virtual industry day (if warranted) DISCLAIMERS: This RFI is for planning purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation. The Government will not reimburse costs associated with responding. Responses will not be returned. Participation is voluntary. Industry Feedback on the Requirement: Although the Government will make the final determination regarding the requirement, we invite industry feedback on the attached requirement documents. Specifically, the Government seeks recommendations on areas where the requirement could be clarified, refined, or otherwise improved to enhance the quality of the products or services received
What similar awards have paid
Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.
Typical award size
$147,824
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $27,003 and $543,174
Who has won work like this
Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.
- 1KUPONO GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC4 awards$138.47M
- 2SGC23 JOINT VENTURE LLC4 awards$21.25M
- 3CONSTANT EAGLE HILL LLC6 awards$16.14M
- 4R3 GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC2 awards$15.27M
- 5DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.3 awards$14.91M
- 6TIPPING POINT SOLUTIONS, INC.1 award$13.94M
- 7PHERSON ASSOCIATES, LLC4 awards$13.31M
- 8ENGILITY LLC1 award$12.47M
Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID b2d0e0c110934a49bff2bddd950ed9ca.