FMS; Qty: 2, NIIN: 012238125
Dept of Defense · DEPT OF THE NAVY
This notice is not accepting responses (deadline was Jun 21, 2026, 8:00 PM EDT).
Page kept for research and related open opportunities below. For current work in this category, use the related notices or browse hubs.
- Response deadline
- Jun 21, 2026, 8:00 PM EDT
- Posted
- May 20, 2026
- Solicitation
- N0038326QD092
- Set-aside
- None listed
- Place of performance
- Tempe, AZ, USA
- Contracting office
- NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT · PHILADELPHIA · PA
- Source
- SAM.gov · updated May 21, 2026
Description
Repair Turnaround Time (RTAT) definition: The contractual delivery requirement is measured from asset Return to the date of asset acceptance under the terms of the contract. For purposes of this section, Return is defined as physical receipt of the F-condition asset at the contractor?s facility as reflected in the Action Date entry in the Commercial Asset Visibility (CAV) system. In accordance with the CAV Statement of Work, the contractor is required to accurately report all transactions by the end of the fifth regular business day after receipt and the Action Date entered in CAV must be dated to reflect the actual date of physical receipt. The Contractor must obtain final inspection and acceptance by the Government for all assets within the RTATs established in the subsequent contract. Required RTAT: 298.28 days after receipt of asset. Throughput Constraint: Contractor must provide a throughput Constraint for each NSN(s). Total assets to be repaired monthly after initial delivery commences X/month (contractor fill in #). A throughput of ##____ per month reflects no throughput constraint. Induction Expiration Date: 365 days after contract award date. Any asset received after this date in days is not authorized for repair without bi-lateral agreement between the Contractor and NAVSUP WSS Contracting Officer. ALL CONTRACTUAL DOCUMENTS (I.E. CONTRACTS, PURCHASE ORDERS, TASK ORDERS DELIVERY ORDERS AND MODIFICATIONS) RELATED TO THE INSTANT PROCUREMENT ARE CONSIDERED TO BE "ISSUED" BY THE GOVERNMENT WHEN COPIES ARE EITHER DEPOSITED IN THE MAIL, TRANSMITTED BY FACSIMILE, OR SENT BY OTHER ELECTRONIC COMMERCE METHODS, SUCH AS EMAIL. THE GOVERNMENT�S ACCEPTANCE OF THE CONTRACTOR�S PROPOSAL CONSTITUTES BILATERAL AGREEMENT TO "ISSUE" CONTRACTUAL DOCUMENTS AS DETAILED HEREIN. Early and incremental deliveries accepted and preferred. POC: Jillian Eder Phone: 771-229-0426 E-mail: jillian.a.eder.civ@us.navy.mil
What similar awards have paid
Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.
Typical award size
$37,637
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $17,711 and $63,582
Who has won work like this
Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.
- 1APOGEE WORX, LLC1 award$9.71M
- 2MEGGITT NORTH HOLLYWOOD INC1 award$951,000
- 3AIRBUS HELICOPTERS, INC.3 awards$901,839
- 4SHERWOOD AVIONICS AND ACCESSORIES, INC.5 awards$615,550
- 5THE GLENMARK GROUP LLC5 awards$385,807
- 6AEROKOOL AVIATION CORP4 awards$161,477
- 7MISSION SYSTEMS DAVENPORT INC.3 awards$112,967
- 8SPECTRUM ASSOCIATES, INC.5 awards$108,568
Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID b9009a7c26264195b50dcccc5207c62c.