OpenSources Sought19 days left

INTEGRATED LIBRARY SYSTEM

Administrative Office of the US Courts · ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE US COURTS

Opportunity details

INTEGRATED LIBRARY SYSTEM is currently listed as accepting responses on SAM.gov. Buyer context: Administrative Office of the US Courts · ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE US COURTS. Industry classification: Computer Systems Design Services (NAICS 541512). Product/service classification: IT AND TELECOM - PLATFORM SUPPORT SERVICES: DATABASE, MAINFRAME, MIDDLEWARE (LABOR) (PSC DH01). Set-aside: No Set aside used. Performance location: Washington, DC, USA. Notice type: Sources Sought. GovGazette adds public award history and related pages to help you decide whether to keep reading. Check all requirements on SAM.gov.

  • Check the NAICS and PSC codes, set-aside rules, place of performance, and time left before the deadline.
  • This notice lists a set-aside (No Set aside used). Confirm your certification and size status under the official SBA and agency rules before you spend time on a proposal.
  • This page uses 40 related public awards. The range describes past awards; it does not set a bid price.
  • Use the NAICS and PSC pages to find other open notices under the same codes.
Response deadline
Aug 17, 2026, 8:00 AM EDT
Set-aside
No Set aside used
Place of performance
Washington, DC, USA
Posted
Jul 15, 2026
Solicitation
USCA20260715
Contracting office
AOUSC-PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT DIV · WASHINGTON · DC
Source
SAM.gov

Description

This Request for Information (RFI) is issued solely for information-gathering and market research purposes. It is not a solicitation, request for proposal (RFP), or commitment to procure products or services. The information provided by respondents will be used to better understand available capabilities and potential approaches to meeting the stated requirements. The issuing organization does not intend to provide individual feedback, evaluations, or return information to respondents regarding their submissions. Respondents are requested to structure their responses so they clearly align with the requirements and questions outlined in this RFI. Responses should address each requirement directly and provide sufficient detail to demonstrate how the proposed capabilities meet or support the stated needs. Marketing materials may be included as supplemental information but should not replace responses to the specific requirements. Draft Notice This document is a draft Request for Information (RFI) and is provided for information-gathering purposes only. The contents are subject to change and may be revised based on the responses, feedback, and questions received from industry. The issuing organization reserves the right to modify, clarify, add, or remove requirements and other content before issuing any future solicitation or procurement-related documentation. Security Requirements FedRAMP authorization is not a requirement or policy of the Authorizing Official (AO). However, respondents should ensure that their proposed security architecture, controls, and security perimeters meet the applicable Judiciary Information Security Framework (JISF) requirements. These requirements are comparable to many of the security controls and practices associated with FedRAMP. Respondents should describe how their solution satisfies the applicable JISF security requirements and identify any relevant certifications, assessments, or security control implementations that demonstrate compliance with these requirements. This procurement will incorporate one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were givenin full text. Upon request, the contracting officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may beaccessed electronically at this address: http://www.uscourts.gov/procurement.aspx.

What similar awards have paid

See what agencies paid for similar work. This public history does not set a bid price, estimate a cost, or predict an award.

Typical award size

$4.77M

Middle of the pack for similar past awards

Most similar awards fall between $1.59M and $10.13M

Lower end$1.59MTypical$4.77MHigher end$10.13M

Who has won work like this

These firms won similar public awards. Use the list for competitor research or teaming, not as a ranking.

Drawn from official USAspending contract records. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.

For research only. This is not legal advice or a promise of an award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Open the original SAM.gov notice for the official record.

Related open government contracts

More in Computer Systems Design Services →
Federal vendorsMore from Administrative Office of the US CourtsComputer Systems Design Services541512IT AND TELECOM - PLATFORM SUPPORT SERVICES: DATABASE, MAINFRAME, MIDDLEWARE (LABOR)DH01District of Columbia contracts