HHS AI Power User Advanced Models and Features Pilot
Health and Human Services, Department of · OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ADMINISTRATION (ASA)
- Response deadline
- Jul 13, 2026, 8:00 PM EDT
- Posted
- Jun 28, 2026
- Solicitation
- 7571TE26R00004
- Set-aside
- No Set aside used
- Place of performance
- Washington, DC, USA
- Contracting office
- PROGRAM SUPPORT CENTER ACQ MGMT SVC · ROCKVILLE · MD
- Source
- SAM.gov · updated Jun 29, 2026
Description
STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES HHS AI Power User Advanced Models and Features Pilot June 26, 2026 1. Purpose The purpose of this acquisition is to obtain short-duration, firm-fixed-price pilot awards that function as inclusive, all-you-can-eat-style access bundles, within a stated usage envelope, for up to [1,000] authorized portable HHS power users per resultant award, with potential priced options to increase the authorized portable-user quantity up to 10,000. The objective is to let power users exercise advanced models, advanced features, integration paths, native apps, reporting functions, administrative controls, and security-boundary options in a forward-leaning enterprise environment before HHS finalizes its broader enterprise AI solution. The primary purpose of the advanced power-user pilot is to establish operational baselines for emerging and frontier AI capabilities to enable HHS to accurately forecast enterprise demand, define enterprise operating models, establish governance requirements, determine enterprise scalability, or develop future pricing structures. HHS also intends to mature enterprise AI governance, attribution, allocation, and consumption measurement capabilities throughout the pilot period, including support for capability-level attribution, program-level allocation, enterprise reporting, and AI Consumption Unit (ACU) normalization methodologies. The pilot shall enable the Government to baseline actual power-user usage, determine enterprise-feasible operational methodology, identify and roadmap which models and features require configuration or customization, identify levels and timing of customization, establish security and authorization logic, and formulate a common enterprise logical and operational model for AI use at HHS. HHS requires the pilot to establish a practical operating model for commercial-parity access to advanced AI models and features in a forward-leaning enterprise environment. The contractor shall support HHS in determining how new commercial model releases, advanced features, agentic capabilities, native apps, coding and data tools, APIs, and administrative controls can be made available to Government users with minimal lag relative to commercial release, while satisfying HHS security, privacy, authorization, logging, identity, data-handling, statutory AI governance, and records requirements. The contractor shall provide a FedRAMP 20x-aligned certification pathway where applicable, including Key Security Indicator mapping, machine-readable or automation-supporting evidence, persistent-validation approach, continuous monitoring evidence, significant-change logic, and agency ATO support artifacts. Where a feature or model cannot be made available to HHS at commercial parity, the contractor shall disclose the gap, cause, authorization dependency, security-boundary issue, required customization, and target availability date to close the parity gap. HHS recognizes that certain AI capabilities are sufficiently mature within the Department to support consumption-based analysis, while other emerging and frontier capabilities require operational baselining before future enterprise pricing, licensing, and acquisition structures can be determined. Accordingly, this pilot distinguishes between frontier capability baselining and established capability consumption analysis. HHS's desired end state is to establish a sustainable operational model that maintains or exceeds commercial parity at enterprise scale � continually operationalizing frontier AI innovation into the enterprise, advanced models, advanced features, agentic capabilities, coding capabilities, research capabilities, scientific capabilities, APIs, administrative capabilities, and other newly released commercial capabilities become available to HHS users at or before the time they become available to commercial enterprise customers, except where a documented security, privacy, legal, authorization, compliance, or technical dependency prevents such availability. 2. Background HHS is preparing for broader enterprise acquisition of LLM and related AI capabilities, including potential multiple-award BPA and enterprise license or enterprise agreement task orders. Market research indicates that advanced LLM offerings differ materially in buying channel, security boundary, model and feature availability, release cadence, administrative controls, reporting, API and gateway compatibility, and pricing or consumption meters. The pilot is intended to generate operational evidence that cannot be obtained from paper market research alone. HHS needs to observe how power users utilize advanced AI capabilities, how those capabilities map to HHS mission workflows, what guardrails and administrative controls are necessary, what can be enabled immediately, what requires configuration or integration, and what requires additional security, privacy, records, accessibility, or authorization work before enterprise scaling. HHS recognizes that enterprise AI consumption measurement and allocation methodologies will continue to mature. The Government seeks to establish the operational data, telemetry, attribution, reporting, and governance foundations necessary to support future enterprise budgeting, allocation, chargeback, pricing, and acquisition decisions. The pilot is intended to support that maturation process without requiring HHS to prematurely adopt a final enterprise pricing model. The pilot is intended to generate operational evidence that supports future enterprise acquisition decisions, including BPA structure, enterprise licensing strategies, consumption models, governance frameworks, release-alignment approaches, interoperability requirements, and commercial-parity objectives. Market research supports the following major objective themes: advanced reasoning and chat, coding assistants, data analysis, secure API access, automation and agents, management reporting, OAuth/OIDC and SSO, audit retention and exportable telemetry, a FedRAMP 20x-ready commercial enterprise tenant or equivalent, usage analytics delegated at multiple organizational scopes, and transparent native usage constructs such as tokens, credits, AMUs, requests, messages, searches, tool use, capacity, or equivalent provider-defined units. HHS seeks to understand not only how AI capabilities are consumed, but also how frontier AI capabilities create mission value, alter workflows, affect governance requirements, and influence future enterprise operating models. 3. Scope or Mission The contractor shall provide one integrated pilot bundle for the applicable individual LLM. The bundle shall include access, configuration, onboarding, enablement, usage and adoption reporting, feature-readiness analysis, integration-readiness analysis, security and authorization pathway analysis, statutory AI governance collaboration, use-case inventory support, release-alignment planning, and closeout recommendations. Provide inclusive access to all offered advanced models, modes, tools, integrations, and advanced features available in the proposed channel and within the ordered usage envelope for up to [1,000] authorized portable users. Enable HHS to try, compare, and baseline advanced capabilities beyond baseline chat, including premium reasoning, long-context work, document and file workflows, web-grounded research where permitted, code and data analysis where permitted, connectors, memory or personalization where permitted, projects or workspaces, agentic or delegated-work features, API or gateway integration paths, and release-preview or newly released model and feature evaluation paths. Document which capabilities are native and ready, native with configuration, API or gateway interoperable, available only in a different security boundary, preview-only, roadmap or future, or requiring customization before enterprise use. Provide a customization matrix showing level of customization, owner, dependencies, expected effort band, schedule implications, and whether customization is required before HHS enterprise scaling. Provide security-enablement and authorization-pathway logic for each model and feature category, including boundary, data flow, logging, retention, identity, DLP/PII/PHI handling, FedRAMP/cybersecurity posture, BAA/HIPAA posture if applicable, rollback, release approval, and user controls. Provide usage baselining sufficient for HHS to understand which features power users use, how often they use them, what workflows they support, what level of administrative support they require, and what future pricing/order structure is most appropriate. Provide collaboration with HHS CAIO, OCIO, privacy, cybersecurity, acquisition, legal, records, Section 508, Operating Division, and program stakeholders to support AI use-case inventory, compliance planning, issue reporting, governance operating model formulation, and future acquisition terms. Provide a release-alignment and rapid-implementation roadmap for newly released models and features, including the steps needed to make eligible releases available to Government users with minimal lag relative to commercial release. Provide final recommendations for HHS's anticipated AI BPA and ELA task orders, including CLIN structures, evaluation factors, reporting terms, integration expectations, security terms, option or surge structures, governance artifacts, and product/channel segmentation.
What similar awards have paid
Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.
Typical award size
$149,040
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $45,000 and $512,504
Who has won work like this
Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.
- 1MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES, INC.4 awards$105.13M
- 2MICROSOFT CORPORATION1 award$49.94M
- 3YARDI SYSTEMS, INC.1 award$29.26M
- 4AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC1 award$20.23M
- 5SIMPLE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.2 awards$17.10M
- 6GOOGLE LLC1 award$7.91M
- 7VASTEC INC1 award$7.40M
- 8ORACLE AMERICA, INC.1 award$6.55M
Recent examples
A few of the newest similar awards in our index.
- MORNINGSTAR INCSep 30, 2025Department of the Treasury$21,400Source
- AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INCSep 30, 2025Department of Agriculture$20.23MSource
- MICROSOFT CORPORATIONSep 30, 2025Department of Agriculture$49.94MSource
- ORACLE AMERICA, INC.Sep 30, 2025Department of Agriculture$6.55MSource
- CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORPSep 29, 2025Department of Housing and Urban Development$186,737Source
- DELL FEDERAL SYSTEMS L.PSep 29, 2025Department of Health and Human Services$228,833Source
Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID 80aafb02b122457d924a7ed7e1269a89.