ClosedAward Notice
Dept of Defense contract category

Notice of Award - Sole Source Award Strategic Plan from Force Improvement Plan Assessment

Dept of Defense · DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE

This notice is not accepting responses.

Page kept for research and related open opportunities below. For current work in this category, use the related notices or browse hubs.

Response deadline
Not listed
Posted
May 7, 2026
Solicitation
FA680026C0002
Place of performance
Barksdale AFB, LA, USA
Contracting office
FA6800 AFICC 767 ESF · BARKSDALE AFB · LA
Source
SAM.gov · updated May 9, 2026

Description

Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC), Barksdale AFB, LA awarded the subject requirement on a sole source basis to Executive Leadership Group (CAGE Code: 31LL7), 326 W Pitkin Ave, Pueblo, Colorado, 81004-1842, United States. AFGSC requires development of a comprehensive, executable strategic plan aligned to its nuclear deterrence and global strike mission. The effort includes: longitudinal reassessment using prior Force Improvement Plan (FIP) analytical frameworks; integration of vitality-based constructs from the Squadron Revitalization Study; strategic alignment and gap analysis; development of strategic architecture and implementation plans; strategic launch and execution management process initiation; and transition to Government sustainment. The period of performance is 365 calendar days. Executive Leadership Group (ELG) is the only responsible source capable of satisfying this requirement without unacceptable risk to the Government. ELG led the development process and subsequent training of the initial 2014 AFGSC Force Improvement Plan (FIP) assessments and served as the architect of the analytical frameworks and structured interview methodologies used to establish AFGSC�s institutional performance baseline. ELG also conducted the Air Force Squadron Revitalization study, and designed the vitality-based analytical constructs. The current requirement is explicitly structured as a longitudinal reassessment requiring preservation of methodological continuity with the original FIP and vitality frameworks (see PWS Task 2). The Government requires: application of the original FIP analytical architecture; preservation of interpretive weighting constructs; use of vitality-based constructs embedded in prior assessments; and longitudinal comparability to prior baselines. ELG retains proprietary methodology associated with its structured interview approaches, synthesis frameworks, and integrated qualitative-quantitative analysis techniques. While the Government owns prior deliverables, the underlying analytical architecture, structured coding constructs, and interpretive sequencing logic remain ELG intellectual capital. Competition would require reconstruction or reinterpretation of analytical frameworks originally designed and applied by ELG. Such reconstruction would introduce risk of analytical distortion, degradation of longitudinal validity, and loss of comparability to prior institutional baselines. Given AFGSC�s role as the Air Force�s command for nuclear deterrence, degradation of analytical fidelity presents unacceptable mission risk. No other known source possesses direct experience architecting and applying the original FIP analytical framework, direct authorship of the vitality-based constructs used in the Squadron Revitalization study, embedded institutional knowledge necessary to preserve longitudinal validity, or demonstrated experience building strategic plans within the Department of the Air Force. Accordingly, ELG is uniquely qualified to perform this requirement. The statutory authority for other than full and open competition is 10 USC 2304(a)(1), as implemented by FAR 6.302-1(a)(2)(iii), only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements. Vendors may send written correspondence to the following address: grant.wilson.1@us.af.mil. The North American Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 is used for determining company size status.

What similar awards have paid

Real federal awards already on the books in a similar lane — so you can size the opportunity, not guess. This is public history, not a bid price, cost estimate, or prediction that you will win.

Typical award size

$1.01M

Middle of the pack for similar past awards

Most similar awards fall between $266,707 and $3.98M

Lower end$266,707Typical$1.01MHigher end$3.98M
Based on 442 similar awardsSame industry code (541611)Prime contracts (not umbrella IDVs)

Who has won work like this

Public awardees in this lane — useful for competitor scan or teaming ideas, not a ranked list of “best” firms.

Recent examples

A few of the newest similar awards in our index.

Drawn from official USAspending contract records in our index. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.

Intelligence only — not legal advice or a guarantee of award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Notice ID 94fcc7507c6e4325a6b18e18c09edca0.

Similar open government contracts

More in 541611 →
Federal vendorsMore from Dept of DefenseNAICS 541611PSC B541Louisiana contractsWOSB Sole Source