Advanced Radar Threat Simulator (ARTS) Variant 3 - Subset
Dept of Defense · DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE
Opportunity details
Advanced Radar Threat Simulator (ARTS) Variant 3 - Subset is currently listed as accepting responses on SAM.gov. Buyer context: Dept of Defense · DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE. Industry classification: Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing (NAICS 334511). Product/service classification: RADAR EQUIPMENT, EXCEPT AIRBORNE (PSC 5840). Set-aside: No Set aside used. Performance location: UT, USA. Notice type: Sources Sought. GovGazette adds public award history and related pages to help you decide whether to keep reading. Check all requirements on SAM.gov.
- Check the NAICS and PSC codes, set-aside rules, place of performance, and time left before the deadline.
- This notice lists a set-aside (No Set aside used). Confirm your certification and size status under the official SBA and agency rules before you spend time on a proposal.
- This page uses 37 related public awards. The range describes past awards; it does not set a bid price.
- Use the NAICS and PSC pages to find other open notices under the same codes.
- Response deadline
- Jul 31, 2026, 5:00 PM EDT
- Set-aside
- No Set aside used
- Place of performance
- UT, USA
- Posted
- Jun 29, 2026
- Solicitation
- FA260001
- Contracting office
- FA8200 AFSC OL:H PK/PZ · HILL AFB · UT
- Source
- SAM.gov
Description
The United States Air Force (USAF), AFLCMC/WNR, has a requirement to develop, integrate, and produce a scaled-down version of the Advanced Radar Threat System-Variant 3 (ARTS-V3), referred to as the ARTS-V3 Subscale. This system will provide a mobile high-fidelity threat simulator to increase threat density on test and training ranges. The Government currently estimates a total production volume between 0 and 60 subscale X and C band systems, with an indeterminate quantity of each. This Sources Sought Notice is issued for the purpose of conducting market research to identify potential sources capable of satisfying the requirement and to determine if any other sources can overcome the significant technical, schedule, and cost constraints outlined in Section 2. The Government does not intend to award a contract based on this sources sought or to otherwise pay for the information solicited except as an allowable cost under other contracts as provided in subsection 31.205-18, Bid and proposal costs, of the Federal Acquisition Regulation. Although "proposal" and "offeror" may be used in this document, your response will be treated as information only. It shall not be used as a proposal.
What similar awards have paid
See what agencies paid for similar work. This public history does not set a bid price, estimate a cost, or predict an award.
Typical award size
$255,654
Middle of the pack for similar past awards
Most similar awards fall between $79,235 and $2.47M
Who has won work like this
These firms won similar public awards. Use the list for competitor research or teaming, not as a ranking.
- 1LEIDOS, INC.1 award$125.62M
- 2RAYTHEON COMPANY2 awards$64.51M
- 3ECHODYNE CORP1 award$35.32M
- 4SAAB INC1 award$16.56M
- 5MANAGEMENT SERVICES GROUP, INC.1 award$13.60M
- 6RADA TECHNOLOGIES LLC1 award$9.00M
- 7HENSOLDT SENSORS GMBH1 award$8.48M
- 8TELEPHONICS CORP1 award$4.82M
Drawn from official USAspending contract records. Always confirm requirements on the SAM.gov notice before you bid.
For research only. This is not legal advice or a promise of an award. Always verify requirements on the official SAM.gov notice. Past award amounts are public history, not a suggested bid or prediction. Open the original SAM.gov notice for the official record.